Maybe it's free? And the manufacturer does not want to improve the archiver. KekaĪlthough the archiver for Mac OS has an unpaid distribution, it cannot catch up and overtake its colleague BetterZip in terms of quality and performance. Manufacturers are so confident in the quality of the application that they charge a certain amount of money. In addition to all these advantages, there is a certain disadvantage, which the budget user does not really like. The ability to view the contents of an archived file without opening it is inherent, which significantly raises the protection class of the application, thereby protecting the system from hacker attacks. In addition, the user can choose from a wide list the type of archiving that he likes. The main advantage of the utility is the ability to open archives that were created on other similar applications. So, here are the five best archivers for Mac OS X.īetterZip is widely popular and the best archiver for Mac OS. The Mac system has its own archivers, which differ in insignificant differences. The most common purpose of archivers is to record large volumes of files into one archive for further storage or transmission. Archivers are not particularly necessary applications, but every self-respecting user resorts to their use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |